How CheckPoint's Participation Logs Reached the Living Dashboard Anyway
An eighteen-month audit of the Living Dashboard's own query log tests whether CheckPoint, the School's opt-in wellbeing check-in tool, stayed structurally separate from the dashboard as its published pledge promises. A Query Boundary Index rose from 1% to 34% of dashboard queries across the window, unmoved by a mid-window reaffirmation of the pledge and concentrated in a small number of requesting units; a parallel staff-awareness item correlates with a fall in CheckPoint's own opt-in participation rate.
| Authors | Casimir Beng, Osei Vandermeer |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.hxwf45 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_hxwf45,
author = {Casimir Beng and Osei Vandermeer},
title = {Built Not to Watch: How CheckPoint's Participation Logs Reached the Living Dashboard Anyway},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.hxwf45},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-staff-wellbeing-hxwf45/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}