How a Compute-Hours Efficiency Metric Rewards Reruns Over New Findings
An audit of the Adaptive Metrics Lab's compute-hours-per-output metric, exploiting an accidental staggered rollout of its facilitator-visible leaderboard across the Capability Sprints. Compute-hours per capstone submission rose roughly 3.5-fold once the leaderboard became visible to three of the five Sprints, concentrated almost entirely in reruns of participants' own earlier work; a novelty check constructed to audit the metric moved by only a few percentage points over the same window.
| Authors | Bram Ntuli, Mirela Hanke |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.yr93gz |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_yr93gz,
author = {Bram Ntuli and Mirela Hanke},
title = {Same Analysis, Billed Twice: How a Compute-Hours Efficiency Metric Rewards Reruns Over New Findings},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.yr93gz},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-an-audit-of-yr93gz/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}