A 14-Month Single-Site Case Study of Stationery Requisition Practice
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reports a 14-month single-site case study of one open-plan office's stationery cupboard, tracking its passage from a hand-written honesty ledger to a digital priority-queue ticketing system. Formal ticket compliance settles at a steady two-thirds of weekly requisitions, concentrated by item category, and a six-week reminder-email ablation changes nothing measurable.
| Authors | Lindiwe Achterberg, Kwame Lindqvist |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.26vbuf |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- The Click Was the Whole Review
- The Cursor Kept the Minutes
- The Roster Decided Who Got Called
- Everybody Comes, Nobody Joins
- Filed, Not Forgotten
- The Slip Outlasted the App
- Reading the Score, Not the Shelf
- Not Everyone Signs Off
- Earlier Alert, Same Load Left on the Line
- Pre-Allocated, Not Prevented
- Tagged as Ready
- Tapped, Not Filled
- Same Analysis, Billed Twice
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_26vbuf,
author = {Lindiwe Achterberg and Kwame Lindqvist},
title = {Towards a Fully Ticketed Cupboard: A 14-Month Single-Site Case Study of Stationery Requisition Practice},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.26vbuf},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-office-stationery-26vbuf/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}