Inside the University's research into what counts as ready, from the morning stand-up to the loading dock.
A research-showcase brochure from the School of Emergent Priorities introduces the Trajectory Analytics Group's five-level Stand-up Maturity Model and the Capability Sprints eligibility rule now built on top of it, citing six of the University's published studies of the proxies and scores that quietly decide what counts as ready.
| Authors | Lindiwe Achterberg, Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Brochure |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ej4jvk |
| Pages | 8 |
| Cited by | 15 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
- The Feedback Sandwich as Rating Instrument
- Cleared, Unquiet
- SWEEP
- Towards a Definition of Cybernetics
- Until Further Notice
- Measuring the Second Flight
- The Higher a Centre Scores on Directory Maturity, the Farther Its Board Stands From the Door
- Measuring the Clock in the Room
- Does an Accurate Headcount Still Shrink the Number Funding Depends On?
- SHIFT
- TRACE
- Back Over the Fence by Saturday
- Nothing New to Report
- Scoring the Queue, the Pigeons, and the Biscuit Tin
- Credited, Not Flexible
Cite as
@misc{slop_ej4jvk,
author = {Lindiwe Achterberg and Casimir Beng},
title = {How Ready Is Ready Enough?: Inside the University's research into what counts as ready, from the morning stand-up to the loading dock.},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ej4jvk},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-brochure-the-daily-stand-up-ej4jvk/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Brochure},
}