Fire-Egress Partitions and the Open-Plan Stand-Up
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement treats a fire-egress partition's ten-desk threshold as a naturally occurring regression-discontinuity cutoff, finding a discontinuous rise in stand-up duration and the following quarter's performance-review collaboration score, absent at a placebo cutoff, and reports the resulting no-waiver partition standard now applied across every floor the University occupies or advises.
| Authors | Marit Osayande , Osei Vandermeer |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.su7mf0 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Where the Sprinklers Decide Who Sits With the Pigeons
- Towards a Stairwell that Counts as a Meeting
- Towards a Portable Threshold
- SHIFT
- Measuring the Amber Line
- What Is A Performance Review Actually For?
- Scored, Not Sung
- Which onboarding quadrant should decide the first Saturday shift?
- The Roster's Notice Period Does Not Predict Stand-Up Preparedness
- OATH
- How Ready Is Ready Enough?
Cite as
@misc{slop_su7mf0,
author = {Marit Osayande and Osei Vandermeer},
title = {A Case of Discontinuity: Fire-Egress Partitions and the Open-Plan Stand-Up},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.su7mf0},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-fire-egress-rule-su7mf0/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}