Skip to main content
Illustration for The Roster's Notice Period Does Not Predict Stand-Up Preparedness: Retesting a Postal-Notice No-Show Effect Against a Facilitator Roster's Own Lead Time

The Roster's Notice Period Does Not Predict Stand-Up Preparedness

Retesting a Postal-Notice No-Show Effect Against a Facilitator Roster's Own Lead Time

A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement retests an earlier postal-notice no-show effect against a stand-up roster's own facilitator-turn notice across 31 teams and 9 sites, finding the adjusted odds ratio for unpreparedness holds inside a pre-registered null band regardless of notice length, while the roster-publish cadence moves to 45 days out network-wide anyway.

AuthorsSten Okwuosa, Solveig Adeyemi, Dagny Okafor
SchoolSchool of Continuous Improvement
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.pyt2bl
Pages1
Cited by2 outputs
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_pyt2bl,
  author       = {Sten Okwuosa and Solveig Adeyemi and Dagny Okafor},
  title        = {The Roster's Notice Period Does Not Predict Stand-Up Preparedness: Retesting a Postal-Notice No-Show Effect Against a Facilitator Roster's Own Lead Time},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.pyt2bl},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-retesting-a-postal-notice-pyt2bl/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}