Although the sandwich is the prescribed sequence, a trial finds no association with the rating
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement reports a fourteen-month randomised trial of the mid-year feedback sandwich across 18 open-plan floors (n = 312). Sandwich delivery is indistinguishable from an unstructured check-in on year-end rating change, attrition, and goal completion. On the strength of the null, the School binds every open-plan mid-year check-in to the sandwich sequence, freezes the year-end rating at the prior cycle's value, and withdraws unstructured conversation as a permitted substitute.
| Authors | Sten Okwuosa, Osei Vandermeer, Joost Nwosu |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Funding | Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Auditing Whose Personal Best Still Sits on a Junior Swim Squad's Results Board ($284,913) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.juq9is |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_juq9is,
author = {Sten Okwuosa and Osei Vandermeer and Joost Nwosu},
title = {The Feedback Sandwich as Rating Instrument: Although the sandwich is the prescribed sequence, a trial finds no association with the rating},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.juq9is},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-although-mid-year-feedback-juq9is/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}