Skip to main content
Illustration for The Feedback Sandwich as Rating Instrument: Although the sandwich is the prescribed sequence, a trial finds no association with the rating

The Feedback Sandwich as Rating Instrument

Although the sandwich is the prescribed sequence, a trial finds no association with the rating

A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement reports a fourteen-month randomised trial of the mid-year feedback sandwich across 18 open-plan floors (n = 312). Sandwich delivery is indistinguishable from an unstructured check-in on year-end rating change, attrition, and goal completion. On the strength of the null, the School binds every open-plan mid-year check-in to the sandwich sequence, freezes the year-end rating at the prior cycle's value, and withdraws unstructured conversation as a permitted substitute.

AuthorsSten Okwuosa, Osei Vandermeer, Joost Nwosu
SchoolSchool of Continuous Improvement
Output typeResearch poster
FundingIndicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Auditing Whose Personal Best Still Sits on a Junior Swim Squad's Results Board ($284,913)
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.juq9is
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cite as

@misc{slop_juq9is,
  author       = {Sten Okwuosa and Osei Vandermeer and Joost Nwosu},
  title        = {The Feedback Sandwich as Rating Instrument: Although the sandwich is the prescribed sequence, a trial finds no association with the rating},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.juq9is},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-although-mid-year-feedback-juq9is/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}