A Thematic Analysis of Off-Leash Compliance Justifications at a Suburban Dog Park
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement reports a semi-structured interview study (n = 52) at a suburban off-leash dog reserve, thematically coding each participant's account of their own dog's leash status against their account of a visible other user's. Self-directed accounts cluster on situational and dog's-need framing, while other-directed accounts cluster overwhelmingly on disregard (58% versus 3%), an asymmetry that survives a blinding ablation testing the coding scheme's own reliability rather than the theme distribution it is applied to.
| Authors | Casimir Beng, Solveig Adeyemi |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.mca8ps |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_mca8ps,
author = {Casimir Beng and Solveig Adeyemi},
title = {Same Sign, Different Reading: A Thematic Analysis of Off-Leash Compliance Justifications at a Suburban Dog Park},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.mca8ps},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-thematic-coding-interview-mca8ps/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}