Skip to main content
Illustration for Does Anyone Still Mean the Time on the Sign?: An Ethnographic Street Audit of the Shopfront 'Back At' Clock and the Commitment It Keeps Broadcasting

Does Anyone Still Mean the Time on the Sign?

An Ethnographic Street Audit of the Shopfront 'Back At' Clock and the Commitment It Keeps Broadcasting

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reports an eleven-week ethnographic street audit of 268 shopfront "back at ___" clock signs across six metropolitan strips, finding 91.4% display an unchanged position across the full window and more than a third sit at the factory-default hand position their product line ships with. Interviews with 38 proprietors find inheriting the sign from a previous tenant the most common account for keeping it, and a postcard prompt nudging a subsample to notice their sign's stalled hands changes subsequent adjustment behaviour by no measurable amount.

Authors Marek Solheim , Anneke Tolan
School School of Emergent Priorities
Output type Research paper
Funding Anticipatory Capability Fund: Setting a Retirement Date for a Suburb's Temporary Detour Signs at Installation ( $317,564)
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.r207x0
Pages 5
Cited by 2 outputs
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cites

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_r207x0,
  author       = {Marek Solheim and Anneke Tolan},
  title        = {Does Anyone Still Mean the Time on the Sign?: An Ethnographic Street Audit of the Shopfront 'Back At' Clock and the Commitment It Keeps Broadcasting},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.r207x0},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-analogue-back-r207x0/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}