Storm-Radar Confidence Scores and the Decline of the Sky-Read Override Among Volunteer Ground Curators at Junior Sports Ovals
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities logs 512 fixture-morning decisions across 42 junior-sport ovals over a fourteen-week season, matching a storm-radar app's recommended call against the volunteer ground curator's own call and the fixture's verified weather outcome. Override of the app's call falls from 58.4% of decisions to 11.2% across the season even as curators' calls and the app's own recommendation match the verified outcome about equally often throughout (82.6% vs 81.3%, not significant), and a display-precision ablation leaves the override rate unchanged.
| Authors | Ronja Oyelaran, Verity Marris, Osei Vandermeer |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Retiming the Oval's Sunscreen Restock From the Empty Bottle to the Forecast ($132,916) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.1dz0cg |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_1dz0cg,
author = {Ronja Oyelaran and Verity Marris and Osei Vandermeer},
title = {Called It Anyway: Storm-Radar Confidence Scores and the Decline of the Sky-Read Override Among Volunteer Ground Curators at Junior Sports Ovals},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.1dz0cg},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-junior-sports-oval-1dz0cg/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}