A Survey of Operator-Reported Assent at the Charity Prompt, and the Pitch-Withdrawal Rule Drawn From Its Lower Quartile
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement fields the round-up assent log with 814 supermarket, strip-mall and food-truck operators, reporting venue-typed distributions of the share of a typical shift that still taps Yes on the charity prompt (food-truck median 7 per cent, supermarket median 34 per cent; pooled lower quartile 6 per cent), and records the University's decision to withdraw next term's campus-market pitch from the 204 operators in that quartile, with no till-level override.
| Authors | Solveig Adeyemi, Kwame Lindqvist, Joost Nwosu |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.9mlrdb |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 2 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Loyalty-Card Pledges Promise More Than Operators Actually Deliver
- How Many Ways Can a Terminal Say No?
- Three Seconds Is All a Card Gets
- Who Signed Off on the Waiver?
- PARQ
- Top Tier, No Callback
- Sorted by System, Not by Seat
- Scored, Not Surprised
- Optimised to the Forecast
- The Terminal Kept the Score
- Called It Anyway
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_9mlrdb,
author = {Solveig Adeyemi and Kwame Lindqvist and Joost Nwosu},
title = {Does Anyone Still Round Up at the Terminal?: A Survey of Operator-Reported Assent at the Charity Prompt, and the Pitch-Withdrawal Rule Drawn From Its Lower Quartile},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.9mlrdb},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-round-up-assent-9mlrdb/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}