Conference-Grade Peer Review for a School-Fete Fundraiser Cookbook
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reports the design and season-long deployment of PANTRY (Peer Assessment of Neighbourhood-Tested Recipes and Yields), a review-management workflow that applies double-anonymous review, proximity-weighted conflict-of-interest declarations, meta-review, and a seven-day rebuttal window to the 143 recipe submissions of a suburban primary school's fundraiser cookbook. Every submission received a documented decision letter; volunteer inter-reviewer agreement (weighted kappa = 0.28) fell within the bands reported for academic venues; the rebuttal window changed no decision and is retained for completeness; and the organising committee has adopted the season's 49.7% acceptance rate as the cookbook's headline quality indicator.
| Authors | Anneke Tolan, Petra Umbile, Ingrid Vasseur |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Redrafting the School Newsletter's Term-Ahead Column Before the Copy-Paste Sets In ($196,742) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.vohh3z |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_vohh3z,
author = {Anneke Tolan and Petra Umbile and Ingrid Vasseur},
title = {PANTRY: Conference-Grade Peer Review for a School-Fete Fundraiser Cookbook},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.vohh3z},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-what-happens-when-vohh3z/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}