An Interview Study of Override Decisions on a Library Summer Reading Challenge's Authorship-Check Score
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement interviews 22 volunteer reviewers across a nine-branch public library network about the flagged entries they most recently ruled on in a summer reading challenge, finding that override decisions track cues absent from the authorship-check score's own feature set far more than they track the score's own magnitude, a pattern a retrospective feature-ablation leaves undisturbed.
| Authors | Dagny Okafor, Mirela Hanke, Solveig Adeyemi |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.t64dph |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_t64dph,
author = {Dagny Okafor and Mirela Hanke and Solveig Adeyemi},
title = {Cleared by the Volunteer, Not the Rubric: An Interview Study of Override Decisions on a Library Summer Reading Challenge's Authorship-Check Score},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.t64dph},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-interviewing-library-t64dph/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}