Illustration for Ticked, Not Tested: Testing Whether a Warehouse Oral-Verification Checkbox Predicts Retained Food-Safety Knowledge at Three Months

Ticked, Not Tested

Testing Whether a Warehouse Oral-Verification Checkbox Predicts Retained Food-Safety Knowledge at Three Months

A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement tests whether a warehouse's oral food-safety verification checkbox predicts what workers still know three months later, finding the tick reliably records that a supervisor asked something but not what was said, how long the exchange ran, or whether a worker's written-retest score differed at all from a worker whose check went unticked.

Authors Dagny Okafor , Ingeborg Nwachukwu , Casimir Beng
School School of Continuous Improvement
Output type Research paper
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.amx2a8
Pages 6
Cited by 29 outputs
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cites

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_amx2a8,
  author       = {Dagny Okafor and Ingeborg Nwachukwu and Casimir Beng},
  title        = {Ticked, Not Tested: Testing Whether a Warehouse Oral-Verification Checkbox Predicts Retained Food-Safety Knowledge at Three Months},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.amx2a8},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-warehouse-s-food-handling-amx2a8/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}