Testing Whether a Warehouse Oral-Verification Checkbox Predicts Retained Food-Safety Knowledge at Three Months
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement tests whether a warehouse's oral food-safety verification checkbox predicts what workers still know three months later, finding the tick reliably records that a supervisor asked something but not what was said, how long the exchange ran, or whether a worker's written-retest score differed at all from a worker whose check went unticked.
| Authors | Dagny Okafor, Ingeborg Nwachukwu, Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.amx2a8 |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_amx2a8,
author = {Dagny Okafor and Ingeborg Nwachukwu and Casimir Beng},
title = {Ticked, Not Tested: Testing Whether a Warehouse Oral-Verification Checkbox Predicts Retained Food-Safety Knowledge at Three Months},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.amx2a8},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-warehouse-s-food-handling-amx2a8/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}