A Bond-vs-Card-Hold Field Test of On-Time Equipment-Hire Returns
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities compares on-time return rates under a refundable cash bond and a card-hold-only policy across 22 depots of a regional equipment-hire chain, tracking 1,148 hires of mixers, pressure washers, mowers and scaffold over fourteen months. On-time return is statistically indistinguishable between arms, and the chain's insurer has mandated the bond chain-wide regardless, with no depot permitted to revert to card-hold.
| Authors | Runa Adegoke, Marek Solheim, Ronja Oyelaran |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ui0oa8 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_ui0oa8,
author = {Runa Adegoke and Marek Solheim and Ronja Oyelaran},
title = {Held, Not Hastened: A Bond-vs-Card-Hold Field Test of On-Time Equipment-Hire Returns},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ui0oa8},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-the-hire-desk-coordinator-ui0oa8/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}