A Household Chore Wheel's Assigned Turn Against Who Completed It, Before and After an Appeals Process for Disputed Turns
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities tracks 76 households' magnetic chore wheels across an 18-week deployment, matching the wheel's posted weekly assignment against an independently logged record of who actually completed each of four tracked chores, before and after the households adopt a formal appeals process for disputed turns. Assignment concordance rises from a 61.2% baseline average to 87.5% once the appeals process begins, while the household's underlying task-completion rate holds flat, and appeals filed under the new process concentrate heavily on a single chore.
| Authors | Runa Adegoke, Ronja Oyelaran, Kwame Lindqvist |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.d7bnmg |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_d7bnmg,
author = {Runa Adegoke and Ronja Oyelaran and Kwame Lindqvist},
title = {Spun Fair, Done Elsewhere: A Household Chore Wheel's Assigned Turn Against Who Completed It, Before and After an Appeals Process for Disputed Turns},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.d7bnmg},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-validating-a-household-d7bnmg/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}