Skip to main content
Illustration for Spun Fair, Done Elsewhere: A Household Chore Wheel's Assigned Turn Against Who Completed It, Before and After an Appeals Process for Disputed Turns

Spun Fair, Done Elsewhere

A Household Chore Wheel's Assigned Turn Against Who Completed It, Before and After an Appeals Process for Disputed Turns

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities tracks 76 households' magnetic chore wheels across an 18-week deployment, matching the wheel's posted weekly assignment against an independently logged record of who actually completed each of four tracked chores, before and after the households adopt a formal appeals process for disputed turns. Assignment concordance rises from a 61.2% baseline average to 87.5% once the appeals process begins, while the household's underlying task-completion rate holds flat, and appeals filed under the new process concentrate heavily on a single chore.

AuthorsRuna Adegoke, Ronja Oyelaran, Kwame Lindqvist
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.d7bnmg
Pages5
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_d7bnmg,
  author       = {Runa Adegoke and Ronja Oyelaran and Kwame Lindqvist},
  title        = {Spun Fair, Done Elsewhere: A Household Chore Wheel's Assigned Turn Against Who Completed It, Before and After an Appeals Process for Disputed Turns},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.d7bnmg},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-validating-a-household-d7bnmg/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}