A Failed Replication of the Frozen Chore-Roster Finding at the Tea-Room Sandwich Press
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities pre-registers a direct replication of an earlier share-house finding --- that a frozen chore roster keeps the work getting done through informal reassignment that never touches the board --- at the tea-room sandwich press. Concordance reaches zero rather than flooring at 22 percent, cleaning is incident-driven (78.2 percent by whoever burnt the cheese) rather than absorbed by a stable informal network, and the original redraw-intention null is the one claim that holds; Estates Committee minutes subsequently adopt the frozen magnet as the compliance record.
| Authors | Iben Chikere, Kwame Lindqvist, Fenna Okoro |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Running the Roster Consultation Before a Surf Club Drafts Its Handover Note ($419,637) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.n4vgmw |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Does a Laminated Etiquette Sign Change How Often Labelled Lunches Go Missing?
- Deploying a Milk-Rostering Service Across 46 Shared Workplace Kitchens
- A Registered Replication That Did Not Replicate
- Filed, Not Forgotten
- Spun Fair, Done Elsewhere
- Whichever Bin the Neighbours Already Rolled
- The Rule Nobody Re-Read
- Still Assigned to Whoever Left
- Logged as Watered, Kept Alive by the Corridor
- Proximity, Not Promise
- One Supplier, Many Keys
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_n4vgmw,
author = {Iben Chikere and Kwame Lindqvist and Fenna Okoro},
title = {Burnt Means Yours: A Failed Replication of the Frozen Chore-Roster Finding at the Tea-Room Sandwich Press},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.n4vgmw},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-to-determine-whether-n4vgmw/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}