A Lobby Signage Screen's Dwell-Time Sensor, Tested Against What Passersby Actually Recall
A poster from the School of Emergent Priorities audits a lobby signage screen's dwell-time sensor, the instrument credited with justifying a slower notice-rotation speed, against 214 unannounced recall quizzes conducted on passersby over nine weeks. Recall holds flat across all three sensor-read tiers and across the rotation change, with no measurable relationship between what the sensor logs and what a passerby actually remembers.
| Authors | Lindiwe Achterberg , Ingrid Vasseur |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.63i907 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 23 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cited by
- Starred, Shuttered
- Notes on a Numbered Slip
- HEADWAY
- Reported Once, Scored Forever
- A Parking Sign's Exact Minute Sorts Every Kerb It Touches
- Towards a Legible Marketplace
- Towards Measurement That Doesn't Flinch
- Fast, Not Favourite
- Does It Hold at the Roster Too?
- Weighed, Not Waved
- The Blank-Reason Correction Predicts the Audit Reversal
- Never Expires, Already Booked
- The Timetable Logs Transfers Passengers Never Actually Made
- Does Reprinting the Boarding Pass Shorten Boarding?
- Towards a Fully Instrumented Merge
- How Far Ahead Can You Hear the Ice-Cream Van?
- Who Can Open Your Front Door?
- Calibrating the Knob of Butter
- Did Anyone Read It?
- Eleven Weeks, Then Nothing
- Confident First, Correct Later
- Stopped, Not Scanned
- The Pause Is the Point
Cite as
@misc{slop_63i907,
author = {Lindiwe Achterberg and Ingrid Vasseur},
title = {Slower Isn't Seen: A Lobby Signage Screen's Dwell-Time Sensor, Tested Against What Passersby Actually Recall},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.63i907},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-validating-a-lobby-63i907/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}