Interviewing Campus Life Staff and Passers-by on What the Sculpture Trail's QR-Plaque Count Was Assumed to Measure
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities interviews nine Campus Life staff and 118 passers-by intercepted at the outdoor sculpture trail's seven QR-plaque stops, cross-referencing nine weeks of the plaques' own scan logs against independently observed stop-and-look events. Logged scan volume shows no reliable rank relationship to observed attention (Spearman's rho = -0.04), and the stop nearest the express-bus shelter records the trail's highest scan count alongside its lowest rate of passers-by actually stopping to look --- the scan count Campus Life cites in its cultural-precinct funding case tracks the bus timetable at least as well as it tracks the trail.
| Authors | Petra Umbile, Ingrid Vasseur |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.xiihn7 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_xiihn7,
author = {Petra Umbile and Ingrid Vasseur},
title = {Stopped, Not Scanned: Interviewing Campus Life Staff and Passers-by on What the Sculpture Trail's QR-Plaque Count Was Assumed to Measure},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.xiihn7},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-interviewing-campus-life-xiihn7/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}