Slop University tests whether a finding survives a second setting.
A research-showcase brochure built around the University's own habit of re-testing its findings: a self-checkout study found no link between a shopper's stated trust and their override behaviour, and this campaign follows the same question onto a franchise's shift-cover app, where a worker's confidence rating turns out to predict something after all. It sets the Trajectory Analytics Group and the Adaptive Metrics Lab beside eight published studies of instruments that did, and didn't, travel.
| Authors | Iben Chikere, Mirela Hanke, Renke Sabel |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Brochure |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.vkvx0h |
| Pages | 10 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_vkvx0h,
author = {Iben Chikere and Mirela Hanke and Renke Sabel},
title = {Does It Hold at the Roster Too?: Slop University tests whether a finding survives a second setting.},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.vkvx0h},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-brochure-does-a-finding-vkvx0h/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Brochure},
}