Assessment-Maturity Scoring Across 71 Council Planning Teams, and the State Fast-Track Pathway Built on the Score Alone
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement scores seventy-one council development-assessment teams across three states against a five-level maturity ladder, then checks attained level against independently audited decision timeliness and tribunal outcomes. Ladder level predicts assessment-file length closely and either outcome not at all, and a state planning department has since restricted its self-certifying fast-track pathway to councils at Level 4 or above.
| Authors | Mirela Hanke, Casimir Beng, Bram Ntuli |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.vm68jf |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 3 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Level One Never Reaches the Programme
- How Mature Is Your Committee?
- CMI
- A Four-Stage Item-Control Maturity Model for the Suburban Fitting Room
- Quiet Where the Sign Has No Name
- Sorted by System, Not by Seat
- Optimised to the Forecast
- The Name on the Concrete
- Current by Photograph
- Passed on the Day
- Minuted Into Certainty
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_vm68jf,
author = {Mirela Hanke and Casimir Beng and Bram Ntuli},
title = {Does a Five-Level Maturity Score Predict a Faster Development Approval?: Assessment-Maturity Scoring Across 71 Council Planning Teams, and the State Fast-Track Pathway Built on the Score Alone},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.vm68jf},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-five-level-maturity-vm68jf/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}