A Nine-Category Taxonomy of Pedestrian Demand Registration at 38 Suburban Push-Button Crossings, and What the Controller Log Retains of It
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities develops a nine-category taxonomy of pedestrian demand-registration events at push-button crossings and applies it to 11,482 kerb arrivals coded from 214 hours of structured observation at 38 suburban sites across three local government areas (Cohen's kappa = 0.83). Arrivals in the one category a controller is capable of logging account for 31.9 per cent of the coded population; the remaining 68.1 per cent fall to delegation, redundancy, reassurance, inheritance and three residual categories the call record does not distinguish from silence. The matched windows return 4,061 registered calls against 11,482 arrivals, a median of two arrivals per call rising to a mean of 6.4 at school-zone sites in the afternoon band, and recomputing the road authority's renewal ranking on observed arrivals rather than calls moves 14 of the 38 sites by at least one decile. An intercept survey of 612 pedestrians found belief that pressing advances the phase indistinguishable between actuated and fixed-time sites (difference 1.3 points, 95% CI -6.9 to 9.5).
| Authors | Kwame Lindqvist , Anouk Mensah , Marek Solheim |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Setting a Retirement Date for a Suburb's Temporary Detour Signs at Installation ( $317,564) Anticipatory Capability Fund: Restocking a Council's Street Libraries Before the Shelf Stops Turning Over ( $241,873) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.x58j8t |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 33 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
- Word for Word
- Left to Lapse
- The Definition Comes Later
- 'Take One, Cross, Return It'
- 'Except Permit Holders'
- Should a Parking Review Request Be Answered in the Medium It Came In?
- A Single Ring at Twenty Metres, Weekday Mornings by the School Gate
- Towards a Justification for the Ninety-Second Wait
- CLOAK
- The Adaptive Metrics Lab classifies bus-stop waiting into four occupancy kinds
- How Far Away Can a Driver Be and Still Have Arrived?
- Lecture occupancy jumps at fifty percent jacaranda bloom
- Does a Forgotten Lunchbox Reach Its Child Before the Lunch Bell?
- ‘Don’t Worry About Your Shoes’
- "Bottles Saved Today"
- Hot Since Half Past Twelve
- Notes on the Back Row
- Towards a Provenance Taxonomy for Donated Philatelic Lots
- Certified to Deploy
- 'It's Not Going Back on That Shelf'
- The Coffee-Queue Pigeon as an Allocation Instrument
- 'No Name, No Claim'
- The Speed Hump as a Local Veto
- Keep the Register
- The Corkboard Half-Life Ceiling Does Not Reproduce at Council Scale
- The Case for the Null Result
- Notes on the Verge
- Compliant, Not Composting
- Measuring the Wave
- Can a Thank-You Flash Reach the Car It Was For?
- Towards a Uniform Crossing-Safety Standard
- The Blank-Reason Correction Predicts the Audit Reversal
- Nine Passengers Keep the Quiet Carriage Quiet
Cite as
@misc{slop_x58j8t,
author = {Kwame Lindqvist and Anouk Mensah and Marek Solheim},
title = {One Call Per Cycle: A Nine-Category Taxonomy of Pedestrian Demand Registration at 38 Suburban Push-Button Crossings, and What the Controller Log Retains of It},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.x58j8t},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-push-button-x58j8t/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}