A Pre-Registered Randomised Trial of Bicycle-Bell Rings and Walkers' Lateral Movement on Eleven Shared Footpaths
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities and the School of Continuous Improvement randomises 4,812 approaches from behind on eleven shared footpaths between a silent pass and three bell-ringing arms, and finds no difference in the walker's passing clearance (largest contrast 0.7 cm) or in whether the walker looked back. The University has entered the finding as a Ring Allowance: one ring per 400 m of shared footpath on each registered pool bicycle, counted on a sealed tally, with no override.
| Authors | Iben Chikere , Runa Adegoke , Dagny Okafor |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.elmej0 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 3 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- The most mature bus routes stop at the most empty stops
- "Just Go"
- Should tea be called if the opener is on 94?
- The projectionist's interrupt starts the short eleven minutes after the advertised feature
- Moved, Unnoticed
- The Sticker Doesn't Wait for a Person
- Kerbside Waiting Sorts Into Four Recurring Types
- One Call Per Cycle
- The Roster Decided Who Got Called
- The Lane You Picked Is Not the Lane You Swim
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_elmej0,
author = {Iben Chikere and Runa Adegoke and Dagny Okafor},
title = {A Single Ring at Twenty Metres, Weekday Mornings by the School Gate: A Pre-Registered Randomised Trial of Bicycle-Bell Rings and Walkers' Lateral Movement on Eleven Shared Footpaths},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.elmej0},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-does-ringing-a-elmej0/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}