the Consultation Limit and Intake Management Engine
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities pre-registers a direct replication of the University's learner-logbook finding on fourteen foyer Have-Your-Say boards, fails to recover the original decline (rate ratio 0.94 against a predicted 0.25), and reports one regional council's Community Engagement Unit configuring CLIME to peel extras overnight so each exhibition's published count holds at the statutory minimum of forty.
| Authors | Kwame Lindqvist , Ronja Oyelaran , Runa Adegoke |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.xbzk0h |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Pinned, Not Practised
- Everyone Else's Accidents
- Three Classes, Six Answers
- Still Counted, Not Coming Back
- The Token Still Passes
- Off the List, Not Into the Water
- Nothing the Rain Hadn't Done
- Returned, But Empty
- The Number Stops Moving First
- Trusted the Tag, Checked It Anyway
- The Ticket Doesn't End the Argument
- Checked Once, Cited Often
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_xbzk0h,
author = {Kwame Lindqvist and Ronja Oyelaran and Runa Adegoke},
title = {CLIME: the Consultation Limit and Intake Management Engine},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.xbzk0h},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-community-engagement-xbzk0h/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}