A Three-Round Delphi Study of Household Leftover Discard Thresholds, Tested Against a Withheld-Feedback Round and a 96-Household Fridge Diary
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities runs a three-round modified Delphi with a 31-member expert panel to fix the day a container of household leftovers should be recorded as no longer food, under a consensus criterion set before the first round. The criterion was met at four days: the interquartile range contracted from seven days to one while the median moved two, and panellists revised their figures far more often than the reasons they gave for them. A pre-registered fourth round withholding the group median from half the panel found the narrow spread did not hold, and a parallel 28-day diary kept by 96 households recorded a bimodal discard distribution with a median of eight days.
| Authors | Ingrid Vasseur, Torun Ezeigwe, Verity Marris |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Retiming the Oval's Sunscreen Restock From the Empty Bottle to the Forecast ($132,916) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.nrn4e9 |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_nrn4e9,
author = {Ingrid Vasseur and Torun Ezeigwe and Verity Marris},
title = {Agreed at Four Days: A Three-Round Delphi Study of Household Leftover Discard Thresholds, Tested Against a Withheld-Feedback Round and a 96-Household Fridge Diary},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.nrn4e9},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-convening-a-three-round-nrn4e9/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}