A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities codes 22 weeks of a franchise chain's handwritten shift-swap corkboards across 34 outlets against a five-rung Swap Reciprocity Maturity Model, finding that reaching the Model's top rung --- the store's eligibility floor for first pick of the public-holiday roster --- tracks a staff member's tenure far more reliably than an independently tallied count of favours actually returned.
| Authors | Hedvig Anyanwu, Ronja Oyelaran, Iben Chikere |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.w0qtnq |
| Pages | 5 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Towards a Single Channel of Record
- Which onboarding quadrant should decide the first Saturday shift?
- Bagged, Not Sitting
- Staff-invented checkout phrases beat the printed survey script
- First Pick, Last Say
- What's Left In The Till
- Rescoring the Kiss-and-Drop
- Whoever Backed In First
- Flag Up, Knock Anyway
- Same Roster, Four Different Verdicts
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_w0qtnq,
author = {Hedvig Anyanwu and Ronja Oyelaran and Iben Chikere},
title = {Should a Swap Board Decide the Holiday Roster?},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.w0qtnq},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-staff-break-room-s-w0qtnq/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}