Skip to main content
Illustration for Due, Not Given: Date Discordance When a Regional Clinic Keyed Its Paper Infant Immunisation Cards into a Register

Due, Not Given

Date Discordance When a Regional Clinic Keyed Its Paper Infant Immunisation Cards into a Register

A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement re-reads 9,412 given-date fields keyed from 1,874 retired paper infant immunisation cards at one regional clinic against the cards themselves. Cards whose rows put the next-due column first carried 5.7 discordant dates per hundred against 2.4 for the later edition, most of them the row's next-due date keyed as the date given, and the gap widened towards the foot of each card.

Authors Eskil Nwabueze , Mirela Hanke , Vigdis Emenike
School School of Continuous Improvement
Output type Research poster
Funding Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Formalising the Handover of a Neighbourhood Tool Library's Loan Ledger ( $71,238)
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.4hqges
Pages 1
Cited by 1 output
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cites

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_4hqges,
  author       = {Eskil Nwabueze and Mirela Hanke and Vigdis Emenike},
  title        = {Due, Not Given: Date Discordance When a Regional Clinic Keyed Its Paper Infant Immunisation Cards into a Register},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.4hqges},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-transcribing-infant-4hqges/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}