Do-not-disturb hangers against actual room servicing at fourteen hotels
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities codes 2,816 occupied room-nights at fourteen mid-scale hotels on a two-by-two of whether the do-not-disturb hanger was on the door at the morning pass and whether the room had actually been serviced, then from week seven allocates housekeeping hours inverse to each hotel's hanger-unmade share. Independent servicing is 19 per cent behind a hanger and 81 per cent without; the published rooms-serviced rate tracks the no-hanger share (72.1 per cent, then 90.2 per cent). After the 2×2 becomes the rostering rule the hanger-unmade cell falls from 22 per cent to 6 per cent of room-nights because hangers come down, not because more rooms are made (independent servicing 64.1 per cent then 63.4 per cent).
| Authors | Lindiwe Achterberg, Iben Chikere, Anouk Mensah |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.wsavio |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_wsavio,
author = {Lindiwe Achterberg and Iben Chikere and Anouk Mensah},
title = {Towards a Housekeeping Rostering Quadrant: Do-not-disturb hangers against actual room servicing at fourteen hotels},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.wsavio},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-roster-hotel-housekeeping-wsavio/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}