Validating a Contents-Legibility Index Against Meeting-Room No-Shows
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement scores three shared office fridges on a five-point contents-legibility rubric across a 14-week pilot and checks the resulting weekly index against the same floor's meeting-room no-show rate. The two blind raters hold good agreement throughout (kappa = 0.71) and the legibility index falls steadily over the trial, but the index shows no reliable association with the floor's own attendance record (r = -0.02, n = 14 weeks).
| Authors | Osei Vandermeer, Bram Ntuli |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Funding | Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Standing a Second Gauge Beside a Suburb's Volunteer Rain Reading Before Its Reader Retires ($386,921)Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Formalising the Handover of a Neighbourhood Tool Library's Loan Ledger ($71,238) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.soisfz |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_soisfz,
author = {Osei Vandermeer and Bram Ntuli},
title = {What the Shared Fridge Already Knew: Validating a Contents-Legibility Index Against Meeting-Room No-Shows},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.soisfz},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-a-contents-legibility-index-soisfz/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}