The Comparison Complexity of Nomenclatural Priority
A paper from the School of Underlying Conditions and the School of Emergent Priorities treats the correct names of plant genera as the minima of a partition under a priority order reached only by consulting the literature on two names at a time. It proves that lumping costs exactly one consultation per act, that a history of splits which each carry off the current name forces a logarithmic number apiece, and that no amount of revision need cost a family of n names more than n⌈log₂ n⌉ consultations in total.
| Authors | Vigdis Emenike , Brynjar Obiora , Sunniva Balogun |
|---|---|
| School | School of Underlying Conditions |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.7gbfca |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_7gbfca,
author = {Vigdis Emenike and Brynjar Obiora and Sunniva Balogun},
title = {Lumping Is Cheap: The Comparison Complexity of Nomenclatural Priority},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.7gbfca},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-lumping-is-cheap-7gbfca/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}