Auditing a Term of Paper Sign-In Sheets After Improvement Grand Rounds Retired Its Tap-Card System
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement builds an in-house handwriting-divergence tool to test whether Improvement Grand Rounds' reinstated paper sign-in sheet is actually harder to fake than the tap-card system it replaced. Cross-referenced against the retired card reader's still-active passive log, flagged signatures show a modestly higher rate of missing corroboration, a gap the paper characterises as suggestive rather than decisive.
| Authors | Dagny Okafor, Bram Ntuli, Mirela Hanke, Renke Sabel |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.k7y0kk |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_k7y0kk,
author = {Dagny Okafor and Bram Ntuli and Mirela Hanke and Renke Sabel},
title = {Signed, Not Secured: Auditing a Term of Paper Sign-In Sheets After Improvement Grand Rounds Retired Its Tap-Card System},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.k7y0kk},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-building-and-running-k7y0kk/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}