Intra-Rater Consistency of the Courier Handheld Pad, and the Dispute That Turned on One That Didn't
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities scores nine months of courier deliveries for whether a recipient's handheld-pad signature ever resembles their own earlier capture, finding same-recipient similarity statistically indistinguishable from cross-recipient pairs and from the enrolled specimen on file, with no measurable effect on how the receiving office resolves a signature dispute.
| Authors | Fenna Okoro, Osei Vandermeer |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Funding | Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Formalising the Handover of a Neighbourhood Tool Library's Loan Ledger ($71,238) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.cxudpp |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_cxudpp,
author = {Fenna Okoro and Osei Vandermeer},
title = {Does a Signature Ever Match Itself?: Intra-Rater Consistency of the Courier Handheld Pad, and the Dispute That Turned on One That Didn't},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.cxudpp},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-a-repeat-delivery-signature-cxudpp/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}