Member Appeal and Steward Hearing at a Suburban Home-Brewing Club
A single-site case study of a suburban home-brewing club's staggered introduction of MASH, a formal appeal procedure for disputed competition placings, finding that member satisfaction tracks awareness of the channel's existence rather than any measurable gain in judging accuracy, with a teaching note appended for classroom use.
| Authors | Bram Ntuli , Casimir Beng , Osei Vandermeer |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.u72nta |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 3 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Randomising Team Pairing at a Suburban Lawn Bowls Club
- A Birth-Date Cutoff Predicts Representative Selection Better Than a Season of Play
- Read Once, Filed Forever
- The Divider Counts Itself
- Nobody Read the Minutes, But Everybody Signed Them
- A Weighted Challenge-Ladder Algorithm Did Not Reduce Forfeits at a Suburban Tennis Club
- How Mature Is Your Committee?
- Measuring Committee Continuity
- Ranked to Avoid
- The Rule Nobody Re-Read
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_u72nta,
author = {Bram Ntuli and Casimir Beng and Osei Vandermeer},
title = {MASH: Member Appeal and Steward Hearing at a Suburban Home-Brewing Club},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.u72nta},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-at-a-suburban-u72nta/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}