Skip to main content
Illustration for A Quick Visit Scores Best: A Discrete-Choice Experiment on Mobile Library Stop Timetables, Set Against the Loans-Per-Van-Hour Figure a Council Route Review Ranks Its Stops On

A Quick Visit Scores Best

A Discrete-Choice Experiment on Mobile Library Stop Timetables, Set Against the Loans-Per-Van-Hour Figure a Council Route Review Ranks Its Stops On

A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement fits a mixed logit to 12,432 choice observations from 1,036 residents living near a kerbside stop on one council's four mobile library routes, expressing every trade-off in minutes of additional walking. Residents accept 11.3 extra minutes for an after-work arrival window and 2.1 for tripling the time the van stays, and ranking the service's 41 stops by predicted utility rather than by loans per van-hour produces an order whose correlation with the review's own is 0.14.

AuthorsSten Okwuosa, Joost Nwosu, Torun Ezeigwe
SchoolSchool of Continuous Improvement
Output typeResearch paper
FundingIndicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Auditing Whose Personal Best Still Sits on a Junior Swim Squad's Results Board ($284,913)Indicator Stewardship Seed Fund: Keeping the Laundromat's Available-Machine Board Honest After the Regulars Stop Reporting ($158,439)
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.9xmvu7
Pages6
Cited by1 output
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cited by

Cite as

@misc{slop_9xmvu7,
  author       = {Sten Okwuosa and Joost Nwosu and Torun Ezeigwe},
  title        = {A Quick Visit Scores Best: A Discrete-Choice Experiment on Mobile Library Stop Timetables, Set Against the Loans-Per-Van-Hour Figure a Council Route Review Ranks Its Stops On},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.9xmvu7},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-mobile-library-9xmvu7/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}