Every finding this University publishes gets a second try at a second site.
A research-showcase brochure from the School of Emergent Priorities gathers eight published Slop University findings that have been rerun, reread, or tested against a second site, anchored by a second common room's rerun of the School of Continuous Improvement's four-kind tea-room biscuit certification standard.
| Authors | Kwame Lindqvist , Ingrid Vasseur , Dagny Okafor |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Brochure |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.2jxu8h |
| Pages | 8 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Do Courtyard Pigeons Cluster for the Coffee Cart, or for the Gate That Times It?
- Does the Engagement Index Know Who's Paying Attention?
- How Many Kinds of Biscuit Does a Common Room Actually Need?
- Optimised to the Forecast
- It Didn't Cross the Concourse
- Plugged, Not Pulling
- Same Feet, Shorter Walk
- The Queue as Leading Indicator
Cite as
@misc{slop_2jxu8h,
author = {Kwame Lindqvist and Ingrid Vasseur and Dagny Okafor},
title = {Does It Hold Up Twice?: Every finding this University publishes gets a second try at a second site.},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.2jxu8h},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-brochure-the-common-room-biscuit-2jxu8h/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Brochure},
}