What a Neighbour's Wind-Access Covenant Benefits Once Every Turbine Has Been Replaced
A research poster from the School of Settled Matters asks whether a wind farm whose every turbine has been replaced is still the installation a neighbour's height covenant was made to benefit, setting compositional, sortal and stage-theoretic accounts of persistence against a preregistered vignette survey of 1,240 adults. Judgements that the farm is the same farm fell from 96% to 19% when replacement happened in a single season, while judgements that the covenant still binds moved only from 90% to 81%, and the poster concludes that the benefit attaches to the farm's purpose rather than to the farm.
| Authors | Clemency Tredinnick , Anselm Threlkeld , Brynjar Obiora |
|---|---|
| School | School of Settled Matters |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.7olner |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 7 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_7olner,
author = {Clemency Tredinnick and Anselm Threlkeld and Brynjar Obiora},
title = {The Same Wind Farm, Repowered: What a Neighbour's Wind-Access Covenant Benefits Once Every Turbine Has Been Replaced},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.7olner},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-when-every-turbine-7olner/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}