Eliciting Three Disciplines' Weights on When a Restrictive Covenant Has Outlived Its Purpose
A research poster from the School of Settled Matters asks six planners, six ecologists and six conveyancers to weight five obsolescence criteria and score 40 registered covenants from one district's superseded titles over two rounds. The three disciplines rank covenants with a stated purpose almost alike (Spearman 0.81 to 0.88) but part company where the instrument is silent (0.21 to 0.34), each imputing the purpose its own training can see, and the poster concludes that a panel's composition decides what a lost purpose turns out to have been.
| Authors | Clemency Tredinnick , Mirela Hanke , Odalys Penhallow |
|---|---|
| School | School of Settled Matters |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ficsnd |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 8 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_ficsnd,
author = {Clemency Tredinnick and Mirela Hanke and Odalys Penhallow},
title = {What the Burden Was For: Eliciting Three Disciplines' Weights on When a Restrictive Covenant Has Outlived Its Purpose},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ficsnd},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-multi-criteria-elicitation-ficsnd/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}