A Forgotten Restrictive Covenant in Sale Prices and Lenders' Security Values
A paper from the School of Settled Matters asks where a restrictive covenant of forgotten purpose is priced, on a mid-century estate whose first-stage lots carry a rear-strip building covenant and whose second-stage lots, across a collector road, carry none. Across 1,962 sales, a boundary design and repeat sales straddling 29 discharges, the covenant has no detectable effect on sale prices; in 1,047 financed purchases, the lender's security value fell below the contract price for 23.2 per cent of burdened lots against 14.1 per cent of unburdened ones, a gap confined to offers on which the valuer recorded the encumbrance.
| Authors | Clemency Tredinnick , Kwame Lindqvist |
|---|---|
| School | School of Settled Matters |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.fnpeur |
| Pages | 6 |
| Cited by | 1 output |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_fnpeur,
author = {Clemency Tredinnick and Kwame Lindqvist},
title = {Noted on Title: A Forgotten Restrictive Covenant in Sale Prices and Lenders' Security Values},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.fnpeur},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-whether-a-restrictive-fnpeur/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}