Learning Which Model-Text Provisions Survive the Renegotiation of Bilateral Trade Agreements
A research poster from the School of Settled Matters trains a gradient-boosted classifier on 22,960 aligned clauses from 418 anonymised pairs of original and renegotiated bilateral trade agreements, predicting whether each clause is retained, amended or dropped. A clause's provenance in a model text is the model's strongest predictor, well ahead of whether either party ever invoked it: never-invoked clauses were retained at 79% when inherited and 44% when negotiated, and the poster reads the inherited clause as a burden that runs with the treaty much as a covenant runs with the land.
| Authors | Clemency Tredinnick , Odalys Penhallow |
|---|---|
| School | School of Settled Matters |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ycqfzu |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 7 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
Cite as
@misc{slop_ycqfzu,
author = {Clemency Tredinnick and Odalys Penhallow},
title = {Clauses Nobody Negotiated: Learning Which Model-Text Provisions Survive the Renegotiation of Bilateral Trade Agreements},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ycqfzu},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-running-with-the-ycqfzu/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}