Systematic Calibration Of Rater Evaluations
A population survey circulates one anonymised performance-review self-assessment entry to 2,830 managers across 46 workplaces for independent blind scoring. The assigned score spans the full five-point scale in every rater-tenure band, and the resulting SCORE credential becomes a promotion-panel eligibility requirement at four workplaces.
| Authors | Ronja Oyelaran , Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.gklg0g |
| Pages | 1 |
| Cited by | 12 outputs |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cited by
- Nobody Finishes Last
- Carried by Silence
- A Good Drying Day
- Other (Please Specify)
- No, I Think You've Covered Everything
- "I Was Still Reading the Email"
- Early, Not Yours
- Until Further Notice
- SHIFT
- PROXY
- Removing the Neutral Middle Rating Increases Formal Appeals Against Performance Reviews
- Credited, Not Flexible
Cite as
@misc{slop_gklg0g,
author = {Ronja Oyelaran and Casimir Beng},
title = {SCORE: Systematic Calibration Of Rater Evaluations},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.gklg0g},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-the-performance-review-s-gklg0g/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}