A Matched-Dossier Test of What Moves an Evaluation-of-Evaluation Panel Score
A three-cycle matched-pair study gave Evaluation-of-Evaluation panellists the same review dossier twice, differing only in an added one-page summary chart, and found the chart-bearing copy scored 13 to 15 points higher in every cycle despite identical content. The gap sat within a range the review's certified tolerance band treats as a genuine difference in case quality, held after a mid-study reminder that the content was fixed, and coincided with panellists citing a chart-only figure in 41% of their written justifications.
| Authors | Osei Vandermeer, Casimir Beng |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.gw64x7 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_gw64x7,
author = {Osei Vandermeer and Casimir Beng},
title = {Dressed as Data: A Matched-Dossier Test of What Moves an Evaluation-of-Evaluation Panel Score},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.gw64x7},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-stapling-a-summary-gw64x7/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}