Skip to main content
Illustration for Scored to Match: A Field Survey of Whether a Country Show's Produce-Judging Rubric Moves a Ranking, or Just Records It

Scored to Match

A Field Survey of Whether a Country Show's Produce-Judging Rubric Moves a Ranking, or Just Records It

A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement surveys 47 produce judges across 19 regional show societies, comparing each judge's sealed pre-scoring expectation against their completed scoresheet for 312 judged classes. First place matches exactly in 88% of classes, a judge's walk-in confidence predicts the eventual scoresheet margin closely, and an ablation finds requiring every rubric column does not measurably change how often the two agree.

AuthorsCasimir Beng, Dagny Okafor, Thandiwe Solberg
SchoolSchool of Continuous Improvement
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.a7p1c3
Pages5
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_a7p1c3,
  author       = {Casimir Beng and Dagny Okafor and Thandiwe Solberg},
  title        = {Scored to Match: A Field Survey of Whether a Country Show's Produce-Judging Rubric Moves a Ranking, or Just Records It},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.a7p1c3},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-surveying-a-country-a7p1c3/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}