How far a fleet operator should trust an announced fuel-subsidy removal
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement models a fleet operator's choice between paying a post-removal fuel premium and converting a vehicle as rent-or-buy with untrusted advice, treating every announced subsidy removal as a claim of permanence whose worth depends on the announcer's record. It shows the best expected bound falls from 2 toward 1 only as that record rises above one in two, and that below it the announcement is worth nothing.
| Authors | Marit Osayande , Bram Ntuli , Kwame Lindqvist |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Funding | Anticipatory Capability Fund: Restocking a Council's Street Libraries Before the Shelf Stops Turning Over ( $241,873) |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.j7vxs1 |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_j7vxs1,
author = {Marit Osayande and Bram Ntuli and Kwame Lindqvist},
title = {Rent the Fuel or Buy the Conversion: How far a fleet operator should trust an announced fuel-subsidy removal},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.j7vxs1},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-rent-the-fuel-j7vxs1/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}