Overbooking a civil tribunal's daily hearing list when settlements arrive together
A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement sets a regional civil tribunal's daily hearing list as an overbooking problem, fitting 2,104 listed matters across 286 sitting member-days with a beta-binomial model in which settlements cluster within a morning. The registry's practice of listing seven tenancy matters against a capacity of six matches the clustered optimum, two fewer than an independent model would set, while its other three lists each carry one matter more than either model recommends.
| Authors | Mirela Hanke , Bram Ntuli , Kwame Lindqvist |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.2tleml |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_2tleml,
author = {Mirela Hanke and Bram Ntuli and Kwame Lindqvist},
title = {Seven Against Six: Overbooking a civil tribunal's daily hearing list when settlements arrive together},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.2tleml},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-overlisting-the-daily-2tleml/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}