Skip to main content
Illustration for Seven Against Six: Overbooking a civil tribunal's daily hearing list when settlements arrive together

Seven Against Six

Overbooking a civil tribunal's daily hearing list when settlements arrive together

A research poster from the School of Continuous Improvement sets a regional civil tribunal's daily hearing list as an overbooking problem, fitting 2,104 listed matters across 286 sitting member-days with a beta-binomial model in which settlements cluster within a morning. The registry's practice of listing seven tenancy matters against a capacity of six matches the clustered optimum, two fewer than an independent model would set, while its other three lists each carry one matter more than either model recommends.

Authors Mirela Hanke , Bram Ntuli , Kwame Lindqvist
School School of Continuous Improvement
Output type Research poster
Published
DOI 10.5555/slop.2tleml
Pages 1
Version 1.0
Licence CC BY 4.0

Cites

Cite as

@misc{slop_2tleml,
  author       = {Mirela Hanke and Bram Ntuli and Kwame Lindqvist},
  title        = {Seven Against Six: Overbooking a civil tribunal's daily hearing list when settlements arrive together},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.2tleml},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-overlisting-the-daily-2tleml/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}