An Interview Study of How Nineteen Allotment-Society Volunteer Coordinators Decide Who Came to the Working Bee
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities interviews nineteen allotment-society volunteer coordinators about how they decide that a person came to the working bee, coding the transcripts in the coordinators' own phrases. Seventeen describe attendance as being seen with a tool, fourteen require the sighting to come from a second tool-holder, and fifteen exclude the coordinator's own clipboard; the University adopts the two-tool sighting as the attendance standard for its committees, with a Sighting Column in every set of minutes.
| Authors | Marek Solheim, Anouk Mensah, Hedvig Anyanwu |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.w3zxqb |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
- Towards a Maturity Model for Allotment Waiting Lists
- Towards Unified Plot-Compliance Telemetry
- Towards Full Assurance
- Most Raffle Tickets Are Sold by a Few Volunteers
- Who Actually Presses the Override?
- Does Knowing Who's Read It Keep People Talking?
- The Jar That Stopped Filling
- The Ticket Confirms What the Marshal Already Called
- Pre-Allocated, Not Prevented
- What the Roster Remembers
Cite as
@misc{slop_w3zxqb,
author = {Marek Solheim and Anouk Mensah and Hedvig Anyanwu},
title = {Seen With a Rake: An Interview Study of How Nineteen Allotment-Society Volunteer Coordinators Decide Who Came to the Working Bee},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.w3zxqb},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-the-volunteer-coordinator-w3zxqb/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}