Skip to main content
Illustration for First Referral, Last Complaint: A Matched-Groups Comparison of Early Silent-Study-Pod Referral Against Verbal-Warning-Only Response in Closing a Student's First Noise-Complaint Record

First Referral, Last Complaint

A Matched-Groups Comparison of Early Silent-Study-Pod Referral Against Verbal-Warning-Only Response in Closing a Student's First Noise-Complaint Record

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities matches 348 students' first library noise complaints into 174 pairs on venue, time of day, and severity, comparing an informal silent-study-pod referral against a verbal-warning-only response from the duty librarian rostered at the time. The referral arm's complaint record closes within twelve weeks at a substantially higher rate than the warning-only arm's (75.9% against 56.9%), and reopened files in the referral arm take longer to reopen; the effect holds regardless of whether the referring librarian is senior or junior staff.

AuthorsKwame Lindqvist, Anouk Mensah
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.fkv8do
Pages5
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_fkv8do,
  author       = {Kwame Lindqvist and Anouk Mensah},
  title        = {First Referral, Last Complaint: A Matched-Groups Comparison of Early Silent-Study-Pod Referral Against Verbal-Warning-Only Response in Closing a Student's First Noise-Complaint Record},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.fkv8do},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-testing-whether-an-fkv8do/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}