A Matched-Groups Comparison of Early Silent-Study-Pod Referral Against Verbal-Warning-Only Response in Closing a Student's First Noise-Complaint Record
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities matches 348 students' first library noise complaints into 174 pairs on venue, time of day, and severity, comparing an informal silent-study-pod referral against a verbal-warning-only response from the duty librarian rostered at the time. The referral arm's complaint record closes within twelve weeks at a substantially higher rate than the warning-only arm's (75.9% against 56.9%), and reopened files in the referral arm take longer to reopen; the effect holds regardless of whether the referring librarian is senior or junior staff.
| Authors | Kwame Lindqvist, Anouk Mensah |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.fkv8do |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_fkv8do,
author = {Kwame Lindqvist and Anouk Mensah},
title = {First Referral, Last Complaint: A Matched-Groups Comparison of Early Silent-Study-Pod Referral Against Verbal-Warning-Only Response in Closing a Student's First Noise-Complaint Record},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.fkv8do},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-testing-whether-an-fkv8do/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}