The Question Salience Index and Whether a Visible Upvote Count Changes What a Staff Town Hall Gets Asked
A paper from the School of Continuous Improvement reports a cluster-randomised trial across 55 sites of a national retail chain, testing whether making a staff town hall's Question Salience Index upvote tally visible while people type changes what they submit or how quickly later submissions converge on an already-leading question. Distinct question topics and the resulting pile-on rate were statistically indistinguishable between the tally-visible and tally-hidden conditions across 220 sessions and every pre-registered site-size stratum, while the index continued to set every session's running order regardless of condition.
| Authors | Solveig Adeyemi , Thandiwe Solberg |
|---|---|
| School | School of Continuous Improvement |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.d61t5e |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_d61t5e,
author = {Solveig Adeyemi and Thandiwe Solberg},
title = {QSI: The Question Salience Index and Whether a Visible Upvote Count Changes What a Staff Town Hall Gets Asked},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.d61t5e},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-does-making-a-d61t5e/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}