Skip to main content
Illustration for Reinstated, Not Claimed: Auditing Whether Parking-Office Staff Log a Manually Reversed Permit Retirement as Their Own Call or the Priority-Tier Score's

Reinstated, Not Claimed

Auditing Whether Parking-Office Staff Log a Manually Reversed Permit Retirement as Their Own Call or the Priority-Tier Score's

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reconstructs the Parking Office's priority-tier score against 227 permits manually reinstated across four allocation cycles, finding that reversals logged as a score revision show no reconstructed change in the underlying score in the large majority of cases, while reversals logged as a staff override rarely coincide with one.

AuthorsMarek Solheim, Bram Ntuli
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.ovm5ni
Pages6
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_ovm5ni,
  author       = {Marek Solheim and Bram Ntuli},
  title        = {Reinstated, Not Claimed: Auditing Whether Parking-Office Staff Log a Manually Reversed Permit Retirement as Their Own Call or the Priority-Tier Score's},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.ovm5ni},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-whether-ovm5ni/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}