Auditing Whether Parking-Office Staff Log a Manually Reversed Permit Retirement as Their Own Call or the Priority-Tier Score's
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities reconstructs the Parking Office's priority-tier score against 227 permits manually reinstated across four allocation cycles, finding that reversals logged as a score revision show no reconstructed change in the underlying score in the large majority of cases, while reversals logged as a staff override rarely coincide with one.
| Authors | Marek Solheim, Bram Ntuli |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.ovm5ni |
| Pages | 6 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_ovm5ni,
author = {Marek Solheim and Bram Ntuli},
title = {Reinstated, Not Claimed: Auditing Whether Parking-Office Staff Log a Manually Reversed Permit Retirement as Their Own Call or the Priority-Tier Score's},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.ovm5ni},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-auditing-whether-ovm5ni/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}