Auditing the Motor-Pool Desk's Booking-Deposit Tier Against Its Own Written Risk Rubric
A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities reconstructs the motor-pool desk's written risk rubric against 1,140 pool-vehicle bookings across one teaching semester, cross-validated with eleven staff interviews. Charged-tier agreement with the rubric averages 82% while the key board is quiet and falls to 34% once three or more drivers are waiting, a pattern consistent across all three shift types.
| Authors | Fenna Okoro, Lindiwe Achterberg |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research poster |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.jkn6nb |
| Pages | 1 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cite as
@misc{slop_jkn6nb,
author = {Fenna Okoro and Lindiwe Achterberg},
title = {Read When the Queue Is Empty: Auditing the Motor-Pool Desk's Booking-Deposit Tier Against Its Own Written Risk Rubric},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.jkn6nb},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-interviewing-the-campus-jkn6nb/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research poster},
}