Skip to main content
Illustration for Read When the Queue Is Empty: Auditing the Motor-Pool Desk's Booking-Deposit Tier Against Its Own Written Risk Rubric

Read When the Queue Is Empty

Auditing the Motor-Pool Desk's Booking-Deposit Tier Against Its Own Written Risk Rubric

A research poster from the School of Emergent Priorities reconstructs the motor-pool desk's written risk rubric against 1,140 pool-vehicle bookings across one teaching semester, cross-validated with eleven staff interviews. Charged-tier agreement with the rubric averages 82% while the key board is quiet and falls to 34% once three or more drivers are waiting, a pattern consistent across all three shift types.

AuthorsFenna Okoro, Lindiwe Achterberg
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch poster
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.jkn6nb
Pages1
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cite as

@misc{slop_jkn6nb,
  author       = {Fenna Okoro and Lindiwe Achterberg},
  title        = {Read When the Queue Is Empty: Auditing the Motor-Pool Desk's Booking-Deposit Tier Against Its Own Written Risk Rubric},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.jkn6nb},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-poster-interviewing-the-campus-jkn6nb/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research poster},
}