A Stepped-Wedge Crossover Trial of Digital Fault-Tally Scoring Across Twenty-Two Suburban Dog-Obedience Clubs
A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities and the School of Continuous Improvement reports a pre-registered, stepped-wedge crossover trial of a handheld digital scoring application against the paper scorecard it was built to replace, across twenty-two suburban dog-obedience clubs over a ten-round season. The digital tally moved none of three pre-registered outcomes, the formal dispute rate, handler-perceived fairness, and inter-rater agreement, outside their equivalence bounds, and the state governing council has since made the application the only scoring method a registered trial may use.
| Authors | Anouk Mensah, Renke Sabel |
|---|---|
| School | School of Emergent Priorities |
| Output type | Research paper |
| Published | |
| DOI | 10.5555/slop.xghi1d |
| Pages | 5 |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Licence | CC BY 4.0 |
Cites
Cite as
@misc{slop_xghi1d,
author = {Anouk Mensah and Renke Sabel},
title = {Faultless, Not Fairer: A Stepped-Wedge Crossover Trial of Digital Fault-Tally Scoring Across Twenty-Two Suburban Dog-Obedience Clubs},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Slop University},
doi = {10.5555/slop.xghi1d},
url = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-digital-fault-tally-xghi1d/},
version = {1.0},
note = {Research paper},
}