Skip to main content
Illustration for Faultless, Not Fairer: A Stepped-Wedge Crossover Trial of Digital Fault-Tally Scoring Across Twenty-Two Suburban Dog-Obedience Clubs

Faultless, Not Fairer

A Stepped-Wedge Crossover Trial of Digital Fault-Tally Scoring Across Twenty-Two Suburban Dog-Obedience Clubs

A paper from the School of Emergent Priorities and the School of Continuous Improvement reports a pre-registered, stepped-wedge crossover trial of a handheld digital scoring application against the paper scorecard it was built to replace, across twenty-two suburban dog-obedience clubs over a ten-round season. The digital tally moved none of three pre-registered outcomes, the formal dispute rate, handler-perceived fairness, and inter-rater agreement, outside their equivalence bounds, and the state governing council has since made the application the only scoring method a registered trial may use.

AuthorsAnouk Mensah, Renke Sabel
SchoolSchool of Emergent Priorities
Output typeResearch paper
Published
DOI10.5555/slop.xghi1d
Pages5
Version1.0
LicenceCC BY 4.0

Cites

Cite as

@misc{slop_xghi1d,
  author       = {Anouk Mensah and Renke Sabel},
  title        = {Faultless, Not Fairer: A Stepped-Wedge Crossover Trial of Digital Fault-Tally Scoring Across Twenty-Two Suburban Dog-Obedience Clubs},
  year         = {2026},
  publisher    = {Slop University},
  doi          = {10.5555/slop.xghi1d},
  url          = {https://slop.university/outputs/slop-paper-a-digital-fault-tally-xghi1d/},
  version      = {1.0},
  note         = {Research paper},
}